DA Review of Complaint Involving Compton Councilman Andre Spicer
- Citizens Coalition Admin
- Dec 20, 2025
- 3 min read
Why This Matters to Compton Residents
This issue matters because it involves how public money and campaign funds are used by elected officials. City credit cards are funded by taxpayers and governed by specific rules meant to ensure transparency, accountability, and proper use. Campaign finance laws exist to prevent personal benefit from political contributions and to maintain public trust in local government.
When concerns arise about whether these rules were followed, residents have the right to ask questions, review public records, and expect oversight agencies to examine the facts. The current review by the District Attorney’s Office reflects those accountability safeguards at work. No findings have been made, and no conclusions should be assumed while the process continues.
While the complaint raises concerns about both the use of a city-issued credit card and campaign finances, the District Attorney’s Office has only confirmed that the matter is under review. Campaign finance issues are generally enforced by the Fair Political Practices Commission, while the DA typically focuses on potential criminal misuse of public funds.
Timeline: DA Review of Complaint Involving a Compton City Council Member
March 2023
The Spicer for Mayor 2026 campaign reports receiving a $90,000 contribution from Dr. Dre (Andre Young).
December 2024
The Compton City Council adopts a resolution authorizing the City Manager to issue city credit cards (Cal-Cards). The policy limits elected officials’ use of the cards to travel and training expenses only.
2023–2024 (Campaign Filings)
Campaign disclosures show Councilman Andre Spicer paid himself $6,000 from campaign funds for consulting, photography, and fundraising services.
2025 (Throughout the Year)
City credit card statements for the 2025 calendar year are generated and later released to the public.
December 3, 2025
A formal complaint is filed with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, requesting a Public Integrity Unit investigation into alleged misuse of a city-issued credit card and potential violations of state campaign finance laws. The identity of the individual who filed the formal complaint typically remains confidential during the course of the review.
Early December 2025
Residents raise concerns during Compton City Council meetings, questioning whether certain expenditures complied with city policy. Councilman Andre Spicer releases a video stating that a nearly $1,500 charge covered travel expenses for a local rapper attending an event he hosted.
Mid-December 2025
In response to community concern, City Manager Willie Hopkins cancels all city-issued Cal-Cards.
December 18, 2025
The Los Angele County District Attorney’s Office confirms receipt of the complaint and states the matter is under review. The City of Compton declines to comment despite multiple media inquiries.
Ongoing Context
The Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) states that candidates are generally prohibited from paying themselves compensation from campaign funds, with limited exceptions for certain professional services. Former Compton Councilman Isaac Galvan was previously fined $240,000 by the FPPC for misuse of campaign funds, highlighting ongoing scrutiny of local officials’ financial practices.
What Happens Next
Receiving a complaint does not mean wrongdoing has been determined. The District Attorney’s review typically proceeds in stages:
• Initial Review – Prosecutors assess whether the complaint falls within their authority and raises potential legal issues.
• Information Gathering – Additional records may be requested, and relevant individuals may be interviewed.
• Legal Analysis – The DA determines whether the matter involves possible criminal violations or should be handled by another oversight agency, such as the FPPC
• Decision – The DA may close the matter with no action, refer it to another agency, seek corrective steps, or, in limited cases, file charges.
There is no fixed timeline, and reviews are generally confidential unless formal action is taken.
Comments